DoG HaMbuRgeR O_o

​

Koreans eat dogs. That's fact. It's 21st century country, and such shame. : What you think, guys? It would be very interesting to see any korean guy opinion here...

 

What's the shame in eating a dog? Its an animal; it's edible. Just because the culture you live in thinks it is weird or makes it taboo doesn't make it wrong. If you are hungry a dog has plenty of nutritional value

 

Dogs are best man's friends...

 

Exactly what BoP said. Imagine a Hindu's reaction to burger joints or steak joints. Not only do we raise and kill their sacred animal, we eat it.

It's all a matter of perspective. Personally, the only reason I wouldn't eat a dog is because I'd image the meat would be rather tough and stringy.

 

In some countries. There are places where the people don't keep pets at all and dogs are viewed as work animals the same way horses and mules are here.

 

Anyways, the US is the one who got them into eating dogs in the first place. Agent Orange and all that.

 

That was Vietnam wasn't it? They oranged the Nam Cambodia border because that was where the Vietcong and NVA were sneaking across the north/south Vietnam border

 

The French eat snails and frogs legs and think that's ok but probably think eating a dog is horrible. Vegetarians think eating all creatures is horrible. It's really a cultural / upbringing thing

 

They did the same thing to a lesser extent in Korea

 

I would never eat any meat, if I go to Korea By the way, according to greenpeace and animal rights organizations, dogs in special farms are kept in unsanitary enviroment, farmers treat them violently. Just saw some sites on net, with pictures made with secret camera, don't want to put those links here, it's not for sensitive people Ok, you say that eating dogs is cultural thing, but what if that culture part is unacceptable in whole world. Everything is on globalisation. Or you want to say that Guinea cannibalism is also cultural thing, and it's ok and not humanity problem? :deal:

 

Refer to my 'What if?' thread. We cannot define abnormal behavior, because we cannot define what normal is. Organizations that attempt to define and regulate this only highlight the differences in human behaviour.

 

This sounds like anarchism. Making definitions what is normal and abnormal makes difference between us and monkeys, between more civilisated countries and less.

 

Ok.
Killing a man. Abnormal here right?
Go to any military operation. Killing is normal.
Go to any country that practices Islam. Honour killings are normal.

Here, hearing voices is abnormal.
Go to any tribal nation, and say you hear voices. They'll say you're sent by the Earth Mother.

 

they also used to eat cats but stoped that a long time ago, we will eat anything once we get hungary enough, even if it will kill us later, it never hurt me or my family when we see other cultures eating what we considered pets/disgusting animals.

 

I personally find the eating of any seafood disgusting. But I live in the second dryest state in the Union, not much fish here. But I don't go Oh em gee EW you're eating FISH!?

 

It's defence.(except if you are in agressor role).

Manipulation by religion.

It's their imagination.

What those points have with eating dogs ? I'm talking about definitions created by civilisated and educated people, you are talking about controversions of primitive people definitions to unaceptable things.

All militaries are stupid, it's like a parasite in Human Being population, destroying themselves and making stupid concurention between countries. Religion is primitive rules try-outs,manipulation, and past day. Now we have the law system and humanity ideas, there's no need in religion. And tribal people - they have still their culture because they are attractive for scientist, they look like an animals on National Geographic Channel :

What I am talking about? Not all people are able to make right decisions by themselves, and define what's good and wrong. We went huge walk trough history to that what we have now - democracy and so - called western civilisation with many rules. Eating dogs is against those rules. Korea wants to be a western civilisation country, they took american lifestyle, but... they still eat dogs! ^_^

 

I was talking how you can't define normal and abnormal, I didn't need a breakdown on 'why'
XD


PS: I just realized.....It would simply a Dogburger.

 

Regardless of who is the agressor killing inwar islegal while killoing whe not in war is a crime

Samari would commit suicide to retain their honor. Not religion related at all

Even if they are imagining it it is in their culture to believe random voicesare messages from God.

Right and wrong do not exist because right and wrong is defined by culture. Here it is wrong to marry more than woman or to have sex with another woman when you are maried. In other places it is commonplace to have many wives and to have many misteresses you are not married to and it is accfeptable in their cultures.

Also I would like to mention Korea is not a wester civilization and western rules do not forbid eating dogs. It is mereley a taboo where people shun you if you do that. It is not taboo in Korea.

 

All countries which have democracy belongs to western civilisation. Yep, it's not taboo in Korea. But...read the last paragraph's last words.

 

And then, after all this, we have to ask ourselves....What right do we have to judge them? Look what we do to our cows in slaughterhouses for G-d's sake!!