So i have listened to Al Gore, James Hansen, Marc Faber and various others broadcasting how important CO2 reduction is. All of them were men but where are the ladies? Are we only gonna hear about global warming from men? The woman demanded equality, equality she got. Now that she got it, she refuses to use it. Hypocrites! like this guy said: http://www.youthnoise.com/MyCauseIs/?a=index&cause_id=258 ok so just to test it, i went on youtube. Searched for "greenhouse gas". On first page 24 videos are listed. I clicked on them all, clicked somewhere about halvway through the video. Did i see or hear a woman communicating? Only on 2 occasions. So thats way too little when 12 was the reference point. tbh i was surprised to find 2, i would have guessed only 0 or 1 lol.
Wait wait, are you skeptical about C02, or are you angry at a lack of woman officials speaking out about it? Or a combination?
I think I missed what is this thread about. So what that the majority of public proponents of global warming are men? Where is the problem?
That women doesnt put same amount of energy into it. Its like they just dont care about whats going on around them. Like they say, "global warming will kill me - but i dont care". Like if thats the case. Ofcourse the women doesnt wants to get killed. So why dont they do something about it?
So why haven't I seen you in An Inconvenient Truth? You don't care about dying? Why don't you put the same amount of effort into it as Al Gore? Why don't you do something?
Well to do the "Al Gore move", 1 must have money. 2. you must have something to back you up with, like popularity or to be a politican or to be a scientist. I have nothing of that. But there are females out there who have that. So for me, atm, it would be mission impossible. However that could change in 10 - 20 years, but in 10 - 20 years it will be too late - like LOOL. Like lolling because if there is nothing you can do, you can always lol. Now i said im not a scientist, but i have studied enough of this to understand all the arguments the different viewers has. So in that aspect i could go out and say something, but still, im no scientist so i have nothing to back it up with. So no one would take my words at facevalue.
I think Exe is just creating fake controversy. By your logic there are much more eligable men than women that should speak out and they are also mostly silent in the public.
That's why every single man is individually known and renowned for promoting action against climate change? The funny thing is that, because of the general distribution of genders in job types, both currently and for the past centuries, most people who are actually in, or have actually been in, a position to do something about it, or have lead to it being a problem in the first place, would most likely be, and have been, men, meaning that they're the ones that activists, regardless of gender, are trying so desperately to reach, bringing the whole issue three sixty and meaning that it's predominantly, if not exclusively, males who are at fault for being in the situation we're in now.