how to write infinity

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by furrer, Apr 22, 2009.

how to write infinity

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by furrer, Apr 22, 2009.

  1. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    I wanted to ask this question in the 0.999... thread but it was locked. How do you write "infinity" mathematicially? I only thought you might write it with the line over the countinuing numbers.

    "In mathematics, the repeating decimal 0.999… which may also be written as 0.\bar{9} , 0.\dot{9} or 0.(9)\,\! denotes a real number equal to one." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.99999

    Anybody has a clue? You cant trust wiki!
     
  2. marinefreak

    marinefreak New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2007
    Messages:
    686
    Likes received:
    3
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Australia
    i thought ∞ was the accepted mathimatical symbol to denote an infinite number of terms etc.
     
  3. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    thats not what im talking about, read it again.
     
  4. Mong0!

    Mong0! Guest

    8 on the side is the mathematical way to write it...
     
  5. ItzaHexGor

    ItzaHexGor Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,187
    Likes received:
    21
    Trophy points:
    38
    From:
    Sydney, Australia
    You need to draw a bar over the top of the recurring sequence, or a dot on top of the first and last in the sequence.
     
  6. AcE_01

    AcE_01 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    2,289
    Likes received:
    5
    Trophy points:
    38
    From:
    Australia
    what itza said. You need to put a dot above the infinite number.
     
  7. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    ok, but according to wikipedia (who sucks, havent checked the sources though), ... is also allowed, is it?

    And please stop posting without reading the whole post and its sources...
     
  8. Meee

    Meee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,551
    Likes received:
    2
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Poland
    I use 0.(9) for it and I'm sure it's an acceptable way. Dots are often used, but I'm not sure they are technically proper way.
     
  9. ijffdrie

    ijffdrie Lord of Spam

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Messages:
    5,725
    Likes received:
    17
    Trophy points:
    38
    they arent, there'd be no clear way to indicate what part is repeating
     
  10. necromas

    necromas New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    292
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Like the wiki says, all the ellipse really means when used in that context is that "Some infinite portion was left unstated".

    But like Ijffdrie said, it's not a good idea to use it because it lacks clarity, and can be misunderstood.
     
  11. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    ijffdrie I agree, and thats why i got a bit choched to see that on wikipedia (not the first time though).
     
  12. 11-Sodium

    11-Sodium New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    194
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    For plain text, 0.(9) is probably the most clear and unambiguous. If possible, I draw a bar over the repeating digits. The dots are also acceptable.

    Most professional mathematicians would never need write it out in that format anyway. For repeating decimals there is always a ratio that represents it concisely; for 0.(3) it would be 1/3, for 0.(9) it would be 9/9 or, more likely, 1.
     
  13. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    What about 0,654(321)?
     
  14. 11-Sodium

    11-Sodium New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2007
    Messages:
    194
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    That's a valid representation. You have used the decimal comma instead of the decimal point, but both are accepted.

    If you want to know the reduced ratio that results in that decimal, it is 217889/333000. Plug it into a calculator to verify if you want.
     
  15. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    Ahh, no jocking today? ;) I just found it worying that there is no clear one cut way of doing it. I myself use a bar over the diggits that are repeating, easist and most pro looking. Just wanted to know your opinions!