Reaper Bombs

Discussion in 'StarCraft 2 Strategy Discussion' started by Star-Crap, Jul 22, 2007.

Reaper Bombs

  1. Star-Crap

    Star-Crap Guest

    With this ability that the reapers have reminded me of Crazy Ivan from Command and Conquer. If the bombs do splash damage then a strat that i used to do is put a bomb on one of my own lesser units and have him run up to an enemy and have them blow up with the timers up. If done right u could take out a large amount of forces with one guy.

    any other strats in mind?
     
  2. generalrievous

    generalrievous New Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    484
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    They should just bring back spider mines ::)
     
  3. PhantomFF

    PhantomFF New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    82
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    MD
    Well without knowing limitations placed on the reaper bombs, some strats might not work.

    But sneaking the bomb in with a 2-3 group "feint" then having one back by thier probes always served me well. (considering the jetpacks this might be easier in SC2)
     
  4. TidalSpiral

    TidalSpiral New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Messages:
    89
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Aw man, I had just rushed on here to put this strategy up cause it popped in my head. lol I wasn't very impressed by the looks of the Cobra unit but since it fires while moving and probably moves swiftly, it would be the perfect vessel to attach Reaper bombs to. Just do Reapers & Cobras, attach bombs and drive them into the base until nothing moves. Kamikaze martini anyone?
     
  5. SirBaron

    SirBaron New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    574
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Personally i'd not have bombs at all with Reapers. Some things with SC2 is starting to look way too much like WC3... like 100 abilities that need microing... and with a 200 food limit, it's gonna be unbearable (early heart-failure due stress, kind of).
     
  6. PhantomFF

    PhantomFF New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    82
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    MD
    I'm pretty sure there are plenty of stratagies that can be used that envolve brute force and good placement rather then 50 tons of microing.

    Terran defensive structures being good point in all that.
     
  7. SirBaron

    SirBaron New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    574
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Yeah i hope so. But it would be really cool, massing out Cobras, sticking TNT to them and then go like "SHINDE!!" by sending them into the enemy base and watch chaos and utter devastation ensue.
     
  8. PhantomFF

    PhantomFF New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    82
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    MD
    Not to rain on the parade either...but I think they might only be attachable to buildings >.>

    So that means make a total barracks bomb rush!
     
  9. Peter.Hong

    Peter.Hong New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    88
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Has it been confirmed that the supply is going to be at 200? If not then we can't assume that it is going to be the same as SC1 and could very well be similar to WC3 with a lower cap and penalties for higher caps. However if this isn't true then i prefer the extra bit of microing because thats what separates the great players from the good ones. Its not necessarily the one who has the greater brute force that wins but the one who implements the different strengths of each of the units in his arsenal that should come out on top. This is my opinion at least.

    In regards to the ability of the reapers, STAR-CRAP i really like your idea and it'd be an interesting tactic if it could be utilized but from the posts of other people it seems that only buildings can have bombs attached. In that case however I agree with PHANTOMFF and that it would be great to be able to feint an attack on an exp and while they were busy dealing with ur frontal assault scale the cliff and attach a bunch of bombs to the CC. Or if possible feint an attack on a base and attach a few bombs to which ever building you like but i think that this would be more difficult since the main base would probably be more inlaidened with defensive structures.

    Edit: I was just wondering how could a bomb be removed after being placed on a building and if it is possible to remove it at all. Also perhaps the bombs can be attacked to stationary units, I.E. siege tanks in siege mode which cannot move unless the go back to normal tank mode. Anyone with ideas/facts please post :thumbup:
     
  10. DontHate

    DontHate New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    It's not like the terrans to sacrafice their own men to kill some others.

    The zerg could do that though.
     
  11. SirBaron

    SirBaron New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    574
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    @Peter.Hong

    I presumed it'd be at 200, since the narrator in the gameplay vid claimed "SC2 is a game where large armies face large armies" which wasn't really the case in WC3. Nothing has been confirmed, i'm just speculating :)
     
  12. marshal109

    marshal109 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    29
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    i think that it will increase to 400 or 500 so that the large armies realy come out to play but thats just my oppinion cause of the larger units
     
  13. SirBaron

    SirBaron New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    574
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Some systems wouldn't be able to handle 400-500 units per player all at once, i'm afraid... (like mine *gulp*)
     
  14. PhantomFF

    PhantomFF New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    82
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    MD
    I seem to remember hearing somewhere that it would either be 200-250ish. I cant remember where I saw it though.
     
  15. marshal109

    marshal109 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    29
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    good point so maby 300 if were lucky otherwise it would be a conservative creation match but the system handles 400 to 500 units in long battles on battle.net or do u not go on that
     
  16. marshal109

    marshal109 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    29
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    and to answer generalrevious or wat ever hi name is i thinck the cobras will carry the spider mines
     
  17. T-man

    T-man New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    126
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    In one of the Q&As:

    So I'm leaning towards 200-250 as well.
     
  18. Peter.Hong

    Peter.Hong New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    88
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Good catch on that. So looks like it will be 200-250 which I don't really mind. I'll just have to adapt from WC3 which is sort of hard for all you WC3 players.
     
  19. burkid

    burkid New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,908
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    blizzard has said that it is at 200 right now, and i really dont think it needs to go higher than that.
     
  20. Star-Crap

    Star-Crap Guest

    haha its a game son, not real life