Resource Harvest speed upgrade

Discussion in 'StarCraft 2 Strategy Discussion' started by LxMike, Feb 25, 2008.

?

should we have a upgrade on resource harvest speed

  1. Yup, more money = more units = bigger fight

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. nop, I got my reasons

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. maybe ?

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

Resource Harvest speed upgrade

Discussion in 'StarCraft 2 Strategy Discussion' started by LxMike, Feb 25, 2008.

  1. LxMike

    LxMike New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    280
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Actually there is 2 types of mineral to solve the problem, but should we have a gather speed upgrade to speed of the game a bit


    Edit: didn't find the link , it seen i've daydreamed the raise in pop cap, sorry
     
  2. Gasmaskguy

    Gasmaskguy New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,071
    Likes received:
    4
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Sweden
    The population cap is and will always be 200, I have no idea where you got that from.
     
  3. Kaaraa

    Kaaraa Space Junkie

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,335
    Likes received:
    3
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    United States
    More than 200? I wish. Please back up your posts with evidence next time. :no:

    As for faster gathering, I think that's why Blizzard gave the option of adjusting game speed to "fastest"
     
  4. Kaosspy

    Kaosspy New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    23
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I don't know about population size really being that big of difference, I mean wouldn't you want to fight based on skill and not fight with a whole bunhc of units that you cant control, even though it would be awesome to watch!
    I think game depth would be totally different with harvest speed up so, wouldn't it be better to keep sc2 modeled after the same type of gameplay that gave sc1 and broodwar such success?
     
  5. Chax424

    Chax424 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2007
    Messages:
    411
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    A
    The same speed, i think.
    I like the speed of Starcraft, and that with more population means bigger battles.
    Faster gathering woudl just mean fat game pace, don't ya think.
     
  6. Wlck742

    Wlck742 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    2,867
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    In your head
    I remember from Blizzcon how players had more resources during the game than they used to in SC1 so they were building a lot more units to burn up the resources. Also the supply is still 200. And it prolly won't change unless through the editor.
     
  7. LxMike

    LxMike New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    280
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    yes i was talking about the editor maps , thinks of money make like big game hunter SC2

    * still trying to find that page where they talked about a minor raise in pop cap
     
  8. Ursawarrior

    Ursawarrior New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,651
    Likes received:
    5
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    somewhere....not sure
    i think blizzard will remove unit control cap so building around 400 marines bats and etc. will be epic enuf
     
  9. Gasmaskguy

    Gasmaskguy New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    4,071
    Likes received:
    4
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Sweden
    ursa, do you seriously believe that blizzard will remove the pop cap entirely?
     
  10. EonMaster

    EonMaster Eeveelution Master

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,154
    Likes received:
    4
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Black City, Unova
    Not really. I always just built a lot of units, then threw them into the fray and watch them fight to the death >:D

    It was always the most fun with cracklings. Make about 50 of them, send them down, make more, send them down, repeat until nothing is being accomplished.
     
  11. LxMike

    LxMike New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    280
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I think the original pop cap set as 200 is because we can only select 12 units at a time. now that we can select 100 crackling at one time..... OMG huge Zergling rush lol
     
  12. longlivefenix

    longlivefenix New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    Messages:
    648
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    i thought that they changed the pop cap higher but i dont know by how much

    ive made 400 lings before
    greatest thing ever (i had to kill all my drones to make it though :( )
     
  13. LxMike

    LxMike New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    280
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
  14. 10-Neon

    10-Neon New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,713
    Likes received:
    4
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Gainesville, FL
    I am pretty sure you can do that with the current pop cap, LxMike, you just need to have three races...

    With MBS and unlimited unit selection (UUS?) among other interface upgrades, it would certainly be easier to manage armies at a higher pop cap, but Blizzard has expressed an intention to keep games at about 20-30 minutes in length... and also, having that many units, potentially, on screen at once might tax the engine... they have to take those things into account, too.
     
  15. LxMike

    LxMike New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    280
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    But, I don't get why the max map size in unchanged
     
  16. Sakujou

    Sakujou New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    88
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    just build more miners, nuff said
     
  17. Gforce

    Gforce New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    887
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    maybe, it probably would be a upgrade for the terrans or protoss.
     
  18. marcusrodrigues

    marcusrodrigues New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    277
    Likes received:
    2
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Brazil
    I think it would only be another thing to worry about balancing, so, leave it as it is.