SC2F.org polls = poor & biased?

truly, i am - very, sorry.



i mean, i don't wana crap in anyones cereal bowl or anything..... but.... what is exactly, well, prudent in a poll which gives you 3 distinct options, all of which only display 1 perspective of a very personal view?


To say something like [which i spellchecked severely btw ] :

>>>>>>>>>>Do you like the option to select many buildings?

[1]. Yes. It makes everything easier
127 (72%)

[2]. No. I liked to build from 15 diffrent 'barracks'
11 (6%)

[3].Doesn't care. Blizzard will do whats best
37 (21%)


I mean, the sarcasm - does it truly benefit the argument of selecting multiple buildings?

On average, for those of you who don't know already; Slayers_Boxer, a Korean player, makes about 500 distinct movements with his left hand in a minute. that's when hes blasting during the warm up tho mostly... but still.

selecting multiple buildings COMPLETLY changes this macro, especially for the Koreans who have worked SO HARD to train to be at that speed.

i sense mass rejection from them if this feature were added.

IT SHOULD REMAIN AN OPTION, not a mandatory setting.

do what it takes to keep people happy i say, just show TWO DISTINCT recs, the nREC and the mREC, N for 'normal' and M for Macro... this way there are TWO distinct features to measure where a players skill lie or WHATHAVEYOU!

should i be confident with such an accord? the poll could perhaps read:

>>>>>>>>>>>>Do you like the option to select many buildings?

Yes, its easier to manage

No, IT CHANGES THE MACRO SKILL REQUIRED!!!

or dont care, leave it to the pros....

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

shme?

 

Hmm lets think how many different ways do i want to pick this post apart?

Well first i think it should be said I DONT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT HOW CERTAIN SETTINGS AFFECT THE BEST 100 PEOPLE IN THE WORLD AT A CERTAIN VIDEO GAME. What i care about is what the majority of people think about a certain feature. And it should be noted they wouldnt be the best 100 people if they couldnt adapt to certain situations.

Next your post reeks with bias about what should or should not be done much less the polls on this forum. You will quickly discover while the best players may be able to give the best advie about a game the majority of players are the poeple who have the real power over a game.

Third while i am glad to hear your opinion about that poll it really should have been pposted in the thread that goes with that poll. Also your suggestions for the poll reeks with bias by just the way you posted and the way you chose to emphasize your opinion with capitals. (i wonder how many times i can say reeks with bias in this post because it does describe the original post really well)

Finally while i do obviously dissagree with the way you made your post and the reasoning behind it i do like the idea of adding more options to the game involving how much control the UI gives.

P.S. While i am obviously against your position pretty much no matter what, attacking the forum that your trying to change the opinion of is pretty much always a bad idea.

 

Thread locked due behavior detrimental to the forum