The Terran Army Is Lacking Something.

Discussion in 'Terran' started by DarkTemplol, Nov 24, 2007.

The Terran Army Is Lacking Something.

Discussion in 'Terran' started by DarkTemplol, Nov 24, 2007.

  1. DarkTemplol

    DarkTemplol New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    543
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    The Terrans have always been the race known for their versatility. The ability to adapt and roll with the punches has been a major influence on the way Terrans are played. In the original Starcraft, they had a counter to everything, and had no real weakness', aside from a tendency to turtle.

    This time around however, the Terrans are lacking a specific role. That is an Air-to-Air attacker. In the last game, there were Wraiths, who were a strong choice. We also had the Valkyries, who, used properly, could knock scores of enemies out of the sky.

    Now, however, we seem to be lacking a strong, dedicated Air-to-Air attacker. Sure, the viking looks good and fun to play as, but it seems to me like we need something that specifically fills the role of anti-air. And, like I've said before, if it is caught off guard and is attacked in it's walker form by enemy ships, it will take a huge pounding before it's flying, and ready to attack. That's why i feel we need a dedicated ATA presence in the Terran Army, to tend to this need.

    So I'm asking you, what do you think would be a good unit concept to bridge the gap currently sitting there? I personally loved the Valkyrie, and would like to see ti return, or at least its general concept - Splash and multiple rockets. I'd love to hear your ideas, and see if you even feel this is needed. Now, of course, there is no way to know how good the Viking will be until we use it, but until than, let's speculate. :p

    Let's see some brainstorming :)
     
  2. DarkTemplol

    DarkTemplol New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    543
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    The Predator was axed. And the Banshee is the one who cloaks.
     
  3. DarkTemplol

    DarkTemplol New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    543
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    There is no dedicated anti air unit, that's the point of this thread :p We have the Viking, that's all
     
  4. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    I completly agree with you DarkTemplol, and I think we realy need a ATA for the Terran. And that the viking should be produced in the factory.
    I also dont understand why they removed the predator, perhaps it wasnt a ATA, but its abillity to shot down incoming flyers was a great concept.
    I agree with starcraft144000 that the "new" ATA may not cloak, because Terran need something "heavy" (strong) against fliers. So that they dont need to "stand in the shadows" but "also can fight in the light".
    But whatever The predator coms back, or we get a new ATA, i think the viking should go back into the factory, and the firebat back into the barrack.
     
  5. Namor

    Namor New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    57
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I think the Viking can fill the AA role if Blizzard only could make it strong enough, but i doubt they will..
     
  6. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    Yes perhaps, but if they make the viking a strong AA it cant be a strong Ground unit, therefore perhaps lacking something there.
     
  7. i2new@aol.com

    i2new@aol.com New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    832
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    I dont mide the Viking in the Star port but if blizzard is planning on making the Viking the only form of AA they need to hit up to 3 different targets in one round of fire. Just they can keep up with the other air like the phenix or Mutas. The BC as back is nice but the Viking is going to have problems bye it self. I would also like to add i strongly want to remind you about the terrans AA problems might not be so bad because Blizzard has a nasty habit of throwing around Expansions too all there games so expect to see new units even after SC2 comes out.
     
  8. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    In SC2 it loke like air is playing a more important factor. But you are saying like, it´s not that bad if the first game got sucked up if just the expansion is good? I dont want to wait 1,5 years more.
     
  9. Tavisman

    Tavisman New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    105
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I think the Predator should definately come back, or an alternative to it. Terrans just need an air unit for light air, as the viking is for heavy air (extra damage vs. armored or whatever).
     
  10. Wlck742

    Wlck742 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    2,867
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    In your head
    I guess they removed the Predator because its intercept ability would look really weird when it shoots down glave wurms and acid spores.
     
  11. furrer

    furrer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,531
    Likes received:
    6
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Denmark
    Yeah i think it would be great if you had like one for heavy and one for light. :good:
    And the predator could later be used as a bulletshield
     
  12. Tavisman

    Tavisman New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    105
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I don't think it would look wierd for the Predator to shoot down Zerg attacks. But the whole intercept thing might be too OP, so Blizzard decided to remove it.
     
  13. Overling

    Overling New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Messages:
    448
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    We don't really know how much is defensive matrix going to be effective as anti-air. Battlecruisers and Vikings should be enough air-power to take down air enemies if supported by a Nomad. Who says the Viking air-form isn't going to be strong?
     
  14. thrif

    thrif New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    80
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Give the battlecruiser airtargeting Plasma Torpedoes. :p One massive attack, one AoE ground or one AoE air. ;D

    Otherwise yeah, terran definately needs some dedicated AA. Something that can move. I liked the predater, from what I heard about it. :)
     
  15. longlivefenix

    longlivefenix New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    Messages:
    648
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    the predator was also one of the coolest looking units ever
    it also shot fast and served as an excellent AA
    but it was axed....

    i like the ability to shoot fast bcuz it just seems to me more like a good AA idea
    (cant hit em once so you barrage the area)
    this also works with the valks aoe missles (gotta love em lol)

    also the AA must be aoe
    and not too expensive
    just like the corsair
    maybe a fast(er) shooting valk that looks like the pred, does less dmg than the valk, and shoots 3 or 4 rockets per burst
     
  16. Overling

    Overling New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2007
    Messages:
    448
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    I think the aerial power should stick with the protoss. Terrans already have powerful anti-ground. Just give zergs a powerful anti-air, from ground, and it would be fine.
     
  17. Quanta

    Quanta New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    428
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    uhh, no the races should be about equal in air power and ground powre. You don't want one race to dominate another in air or ground. Also, Terran don't dominate ground. They have great anti-ground attakers in the Siege tank and Banshee and Thor and Firebats but the Protoss are hardly lacking. They have Motherships, collossi, zealots, and dark templars and Immortals. I'd say the protoss are pretty well off on the anti-ground side of the game. I think they are a decent match for the Terran. The problem is that the Terran aren't a good match against the protoss in the air. That's why a valkary replacement is needed. An AOE anti air unit is a must for every races fleet.
     
  18. DKutrovsky

    DKutrovsky New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Messages:
    807
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Vikings are good ATA, we do however lack a GTA, i think the cobra or Thor should exel at GTA.
     
  19. zeratul11

    zeratul11 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,315
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    0
    PREDATOR!
     
  20. Wlck742

    Wlck742 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    2,867
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    In your head
    Terrans don't really need a GTA unit. At worst they'll end up like the SC1 Zerg, just better, since Zerg only had one unit (hydras) that could attack air and terran have four (cobras, thors, marines, and ghosts). But if they do turn an existing unit into GTA, it should be the cobra. Maybe an upgrade to give it rocket pods that does some serious AA damage.