Visual Proof of Extraterrestrials

I tried for so long kuvaz, to argue that with him.

It really wont work

 

I apreciate that it could be anyithing, I appreciate that we can't tell what it is, and I believe that it is stray particles, coupled with a bad camera/cameraman,

I think aliens exist, but not every UFO is an alien.
I think ghosts and spirits exist, but not every ssound your house makes is a haunting.
Even though I believe those things exist, at this point I am inclined to think you are crazy, or at least irrational, due to how adamantly you are defending baseless speculation and maaking wild claims, in addition to your thinking that all UFOs are alien in origin.

 

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Viking_moc_face_20m.gif

In short, once you get better resolution, it doesn't look like much of a face at all, and is believable as being simply random chance.

Here is an even higher quality shot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mars_face_HiRISE_MRO.png

 

and here's the second face


Also in the video, about triangle formations.

I still think either one of these could of been something.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5u-20g7Bwdw

I like this video as well, he talks about the high resolution video. But no matter what you think, we can all agree, space is ******* crazy

 

@kuvasz: Come on you're intelligent enough. If you send thoughts out an object and it begins to pulse colours to clarify you're communicating, moving etc. Telepathy is mind to mind link communication. Sending out thoughts and something reacting to them it nothing special.

http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/ have fun.

The face on Mars is definitely extraterrestrial made, NASA edits their images hard. Made same beings who taught us mathematics, currency systems etc. Just check Sumerian civilization.

Hodl: have you read the Terra Papers?

@BoP, you're very right. Discernment.

Please wake up

http://www.escapetheillusion.com/blog/

Nazca Lines

http://www.crystalinks.com/nasca.html

Who was looking down on us when we had no capability to fly and actually see them. They span for miles.

 

Wrong

 

Looks like another out of focus image that is well within reason.

Look, human minds are designed to find patterns, because of the difference in costs. For example, let's go back to caveman days, and let's say that you see the tall grass swaying in a vaguely troubling motion. Its possible that its a saber-toothed tiger, and its possible that its just the wind blowing. In fact, the majority of the time, its just the wind blowing. However, if you think that there is a tiger there and there isn't, the cost to you is relatively little, you waste some energy and time going to a safer place. However, if you think its just the wind and its a saber toothed tiger, you will be dead.

As a result, Natural Selection will favor the superstitous. However, that does not mean that the superstition is either right or necessary, seeing as how Humanity can both ignore Natural Selection anyways, and how we can come up with scientific explanations for why things occur.

But nevertheless, there will always be people seeing patterns where they aren't.

"The leading explanation for the method of construction employed by the Nazca people involves the use of simple tools and surveying equipment. Wooden stakes in the ground at the end of some lines (which were used to carbon-date the figures) and ceramics found on the surface support this theory. Furthermore, researcher Joe Nickell of the University of Kentucky has reproduced the figures using the technology available to the Nazca people of the time and without aerial assistance. With careful planning and simple technologies, a small team of individuals could recreate even the largest figures within days. Contrary to the claims of several commentators, the figures can be observed from the ground by standing on top of nearby foothills."

Do you have either evidence for this collected from a credible source, or at the very least a motive? If NASA could prove extraterrestrial life existed, their funding would double, and most if not all of their employees secretly dream of finding proof of extraterrestrial life.

See, that's the thing, scientists would love to find aliens or ESP and the like, they don't oppose pseudoscience because they don't want to believe in it, but because it gives them false hopes, and makes it harder for them to find any genuine evidence.

 

Did ya read the rest of the thread?

He thinks he can travel to other dimensions and has jedi powers, arguing reason and logic with the guy really doesnt work :<.

 

Don't confuse logic and opinion. You're easily a religious fanatic. Almost forcing your views upon another as the absolute truth. Go home with that ****.

 

Come again?

Please elaborate before i get an even bigger smile.

Im a religious... fanatic..

Who confuses logic... and opinion...

And i force me beliefs... on others...


Lets start with the first!
1. No im not.

2. Someone who based an entire belief on his 'opinion' is telling me not to confuse them, without even backing up his point?

3. I didnt realise my psychic extent was forcing you to read my posts. I guess i must be rather powerful.

 

Um, you realize that what you are saying in the quote is itself merely an opinion? One which consists mainly of a personal attack, with the remainder being a statement that while true, has no relevance to what we were discussing without further expansion on it.

 

This entire thread is his entire goddamn opinion. The evidence is inconclusive so he shoudnt be claiming certainty on anything.

 

Next thing you know he will watch some videos and get afraid of the NWO.

 

Rofl, yeah

the NWO will get you!

the shadowy elite!

 

An elite does exist, but NWO is as dumb as ZOG.

 

i meant in the context of a massive organisation planning evil deeds.. ;p

 

The most ridiculous thing about government conspiracies is that people believe that the government is actually competent to pull them off, or better yet, they are willing to come up with immense conspiracies full of murder and media control, but they miss extremely obvious and critical details.

Take the claims by people that the moon landing was faked. They cite as one of their primary pieces of evidence that the moon landing pictures do not have stars in them. We are supposed to believe that the government could fake something as big as the moon landing, but forgot to poke a few holes in the backdrop?

 

Psionicz, have you been brainwashed? Now you're just acting like a loony-bin. You guys, that photo of the "face" is an optical illusion! Notice how the sun only shone on half of the rock protrusion and shadowing the eyes giving the illusion of the face. As wodan46 said, we as humans try to make things out of abstract images so we can give it a name. That face was not made by aliens, it was natural... Calling every single photo of a speck of dust an alien is just plain stupid. I'm not saying that aliens don't exist but if you call a speck of dust an alien, you're in bad shape.

Aliens taught us technology??!!?!?? WTF!?!?!? We gained through ourselves, out of studying, out of experimenting! Know who Thomas Edison is? Yup, he invented the light bulb. Aliens didn't give it to him.

 

No, Woodward and Evans invented the first functional carbon filament light bulb, they just lacked the funds to successfully commercialize it.
http://www.bouletfermat.com/danny/woodward_and_evans_light_bulb_patent_diagram.jpg

Edison himself let one of his assistants do all the carbon fiber testing. After his assistant succeeded, he patented it, bought the Woodward and Evans patent so they couldn't sue him, and then use his economic base to sell it to the public. Also, the electrical system we use today is alternating current, not direct current, and Tesla invented alternating current. Edison opposed alternating current with such vigor that to demonstrate the dangers, he ran AC electricity through dogs until they died.

Edison was a horrible, horrible person. He was a selfish, ruthless businessmen, who was good at stealing the ideas of others and of selling what little ideas he had himself.

Psion, I reviewed your videos. All they showed were grainy dots moving oddly around, usually in incredibly grainy video. They could be explained away easily as either A: being debris or a product of camera glitches, B: being added, given the relative lack of detail, it wouldn't be hard, or C: being entirely artificial, given the relative lack of detail, it wouldn't be hard to do that either. The tether video honestly looked like something you'd see on a microscope.

None of them had the slightest indication that they were extra-terrestrials, if they even qualified as being UFOs at all.

If you understood how easy it is to spot odd patterns like that, you'd realize that they are not really that surprising at all.

 

what is the NWO?